by , 01-19-15 at 12:49 PM (1152 Views)
I used to love Disney movies as a kid - and really, which kid didn't? My favorite Disney movie back then was Mulan. My favorite Disney song was Phil Collin's Strangers Like Me from Tarzan. But over the years, I slowly picked up upon the flaws of those beloved movies... as well as the uncomfortable undertones. Damsels in distress, whitewashing, taking advantage of sleeping beauties and marrying them; ah yes, Disney movies sure have some great lessons in them, especially The Little Mermaid, where little girls are taught to sell themselves for men they like, because hey, "body language".
Then came along something a little more humble, something a little more intelligent.
I think I was too young to have watched the first Toy Story in theater. Pixar never really left an impression on me till Toy Story 2 came along and blow my mind. I didn't even regard it as one of the best movie sequels ever made at the time; I merely regarded it as a really fun and emotional movie.
Then came the other stuff, Monsters, Inc., Finding Nemo, and The Incredibles. I've actually never been that impressed by A Bug's Life, even today. Nevertheless, it's undeniable, especially after Ratatouille, that Pixar bears a trademark that distinctly separates itself from the tyranny of Disney - its maturity.
Let's face it, Walt Disney, the man himself, was a man-child. He was arrogant, selfish, quick-tempered, and not really that amazing of a storyteller compared to the likes of William Shakespeare, Hayao Miyazaki, Stanley Kubrick, David Fincher, and hell, even Christopher Nolan. Whereas with Pixar, the company feels like Disney grown up, a young adult in his prime who shows potential to be a great man.
Unfortunately, that great man is burdened by the sins of his father, in this case, the affiliation of "Disney".
While responsible for preventing Pixar's first feature from being too cynical (Google search "Toy Story Black Friday"), Walt Disney Studio has, over the years, began to show its true colors as a corporate maniac bent on cashing in on Pixar's talent. After Toy Story 2 was released, Disney wanted to go ahead and create the third film, but Pixar claimed that they didn't have a proper story yet, and their policy was to not do a movie without a good story (contrary to Disney's countless direct to DVD titles). Disney was unhappy, and they decided to buy out the movie rights and do the third Toy Story anyway - with or without Pixar. Naturally, Pixar prefers to be involved rather than not. Thank. Fking. God.
Around the same time Toy Story 3 was being considered, Cars was released, a 'pet project' of John Lasseter. Even though I wasn't impressed, I still had fun and respected John's wishes. But then came the inevitable sequel which totally slapped their respected policy in the face, not to mention the equally inferior prequel to Monsters, Inc. By the time Brave came along, I knew something was off. This was the same company that made Up around the time Monsters, University and Cars 2 were in production. I refuse to believe that it was their true colors showing, as Toy Story 3 totally proved that Pixar can deliver with both intelligence and sentimentality, unlike a certain mouse company.
That's where my concern comes in - Pixar is still attached to the Disney company. When I mentioned Pixar, quite a number of people would tell me that they hate Disney movies. Pixar movies are NOT Disney movies. And as long as that terrible company continues to be affiliated with Pixar, I fear that all the potential in the world would be eventually snuffed out, by money no less.
And before you say anything, Frozen was mediocre. Not terrible, but the ending was such a cop-out, with the standardized "true love solves everything" Disney message shoe-honed in at the end. Elsa could have been Disney's very first controversial anti-heroine whose pragmatic attitude regarding Disney marriage was much more intelligent than any prior Disney Princesses' daft behaviors. What a fking waste.